Wednesday Thread - 08/09/10

BTW Mini-bok,

did you try the pencil thing with your headache?

Aberdeengooner wrote:

BTW Mini-bok,

did you try the pencil thing with your headache?

No. If it gets that bad i'll have a go. It's not too bad at the moment.

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The fact is, there is no-way we can tell if conspiracy theories are true. What's to say someone does come out and tell the "truth" of what happened.

The "people" behind it would have enough power to ruin and discredit them and then the actual "truth" would become a theory.

You may be a cunt who occasionally amuses me with his stupidity. But know that Dubbed is on your side, conspiracy theories concerned.

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The fact is, there is no-way we can tell if conspiracy theories are true. What's to say someone does come out and tell the "truth" of what happened.

The "people" behind it would have enough power to ruin and discredit them and then the actual "truth" would become a theory.

No. But what is more likely? That's basically what it comes down to.

Is it more likely thart several thousand people are covering up the attacks, or that terrorists did it?

& I am not going to got through all the other conspiracy aspects of the event, but all are extremely unlikely to happen individually. Put it all together and there is relatively no chance.

Dubbed The New Wenger wrote:

Harvey Prices Secret Twin wrote:

Someone in the US on now.

Where am I located based on that thing. Cue clever jokes.

Near Birmingham.

Harvey Prices Secret Twin wrote:

Dubbed The New Wenger wrote:

Harvey Prices Secret Twin wrote:

Someone in the US on now.

Where am I located based on that thing. Cue clever jokes.

Near Birmingham.

In Birmingham, thick cunt.

The Magic Man wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The fact is, there is no-way we can tell if conspiracy theories are true. What's to say someone does come out and tell the "truth" of what happened.

The "people" behind it would have enough power to ruin and discredit them and then the actual "truth" would become a theory.

No. But what is more likely? That's basically what it comes down to.

Is it more likely thart several thousand people are covering up the attacks, or that terrorists did it?

& I am not going to got through all the other conspiracy aspects of the event, but all are extremely unlikely to happen individually. Put it all together and there is relatively no chance.

That's alright, everyone is entitled to their opinions.

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The Magic Man wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The fact is, there is no-way we can tell if conspiracy theories are true. What's to say someone does come out and tell the "truth" of what happened.

The "people" behind it would have enough power to ruin and discredit them and then the actual "truth" would become a theory.

No. But what is more likely? That's basically what it comes down to.

Is it more likely thart several thousand people are covering up the attacks, or that terrorists did it?

& I am not going to got through all the other conspiracy aspects of the event, but all are extremely unlikely to happen individually. Put it all together and there is relatively no chance.

That's alright, everyone is entitled to their opinions.

That is correct, but some opinions are more valid than others...

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The Magic Man wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The fact is, there is no-way we can tell if conspiracy theories are true. What's to say someone does come out and tell the "truth" of what happened.

The "people" behind it would have enough power to ruin and discredit them and then the actual "truth" would become a theory.

No. But what is more likely? That's basically what it comes down to.

Is it more likely thart several thousand people are covering up the attacks, or that terrorists did it?

& I am not going to got through all the other conspiracy aspects of the event, but all are extremely unlikely to happen individually. Put it all together and there is relatively no chance.

That's alright, everyone is entitled to their opinions.

to be fair if you see those conspiarcy things about 9/11 is def makes you think twice

samiola wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The Magic Man wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The fact is, there is no-way we can tell if conspiracy theories are true. What's to say someone does come out and tell the "truth" of what happened.

The "people" behind it would have enough power to ruin and discredit them and then the actual "truth" would become a theory.

No. But what is more likely? That's basically what it comes down to.

Is it more likely thart several thousand people are covering up the attacks, or that terrorists did it?

& I am not going to got through all the other conspiracy aspects of the event, but all are extremely unlikely to happen individually. Put it all together and there is relatively no chance.

That's alright, everyone is entitled to their opinions.

to be fair if you see those conspiarcy things about 9/11 is def makes you think twice

well yeah but im sure you could reasonably put forward a case for most things if your willing to spend months coming up with baseless specualtion.

samiola wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The Magic Man wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The fact is, there is no-way we can tell if conspiracy theories are true. What's to say someone does come out and tell the "truth" of what happened.

The "people" behind it would have enough power to ruin and discredit them and then the actual "truth" would become a theory.

No. But what is more likely? That's basically what it comes down to.

Is it more likely thart several thousand people are covering up the attacks, or that terrorists did it?

& I am not going to got through all the other conspiracy aspects of the event, but all are extremely unlikely to happen individually. Put it all together and there is relatively no chance.

That's alright, everyone is entitled to their opinions.

to be fair if you see those conspiarcy things about 9/11 is def makes you think twice

Nice to have you on board Sami. Though this may be above your pay grade. Try to keep up.

Harvey Prices Secret Twin wrote:

samiola wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The Magic Man wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The fact is, there is no-way we can tell if conspiracy theories are true. What's to say someone does come out and tell the "truth" of what happened.

The "people" behind it would have enough power to ruin and discredit them and then the actual "truth" would become a theory.

No. But what is more likely? That's basically what it comes down to.

Is it more likely thart several thousand people are covering up the attacks, or that terrorists did it?

& I am not going to got through all the other conspiracy aspects of the event, but all are extremely unlikely to happen individually. Put it all together and there is relatively no chance.

That's alright, everyone is entitled to their opinions.

to be fair if you see those conspiarcy things about 9/11 is def makes you think twice

well yeah but im sure you could reasonably put forward a case for most things if your willing to spend months coming up with baseless specualtion.

Exactly.

This is actually quite a good neutral read.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

samiola wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The Magic Man wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The fact is, there is no-way we can tell if conspiracy theories are true. What's to say someone does come out and tell the "truth" of what happened.

The "people" behind it would have enough power to ruin and discredit them and then the actual "truth" would become a theory.

No. But what is more likely? That's basically what it comes down to.

Is it more likely thart several thousand people are covering up the attacks, or that terrorists did it?

& I am not going to got through all the other conspiracy aspects of the event, but all are extremely unlikely to happen individually. Put it all together and there is relatively no chance.

That's alright, everyone is entitled to their opinions.

to be fair if you see those conspiarcy things about 9/11 is def makes you think twice

Absolutely. But don't forget these programs a solely derived to make you think it's a conspiracy. Unless you have an open mind, and for the most part apply common sense, most of them can be unwravelled fairly easily.

The only one which I still think is a conspiracy is JFK.

Harvey Prices Secret Twin wrote:

samiola wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The Magic Man wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The fact is, there is no-way we can tell if conspiracy theories are true. What's to say someone does come out and tell the "truth" of what happened.

The "people" behind it would have enough power to ruin and discredit them and then the actual "truth" would become a theory.

No. But what is more likely? That's basically what it comes down to.

Is it more likely thart several thousand people are covering up the attacks, or that terrorists did it?

& I am not going to got through all the other conspiracy aspects of the event, but all are extremely unlikely to happen individually. Put it all together and there is relatively no chance.

That's alright, everyone is entitled to their opinions.

to be fair if you see those conspiarcy things about 9/11 is def makes you think twice

well yeah but im sure you could reasonably put forward a case for most things if your willing to spend months coming up with baseless specualtion.

The naysayers ain't exactly proving otherwise, are they? Equally reasonable.

Harvey Prices Secret Twin wrote:

samiola wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The Magic Man wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The fact is, there is no-way we can tell if conspiracy theories are true. What's to say someone does come out and tell the "truth" of what happened.

The "people" behind it would have enough power to ruin and discredit them and then the actual "truth" would become a theory.

No. But what is more likely? That's basically what it comes down to.

Is it more likely thart several thousand people are covering up the attacks, or that terrorists did it?

& I am not going to got through all the other conspiracy aspects of the event, but all are extremely unlikely to happen individually. Put it all together and there is relatively no chance.

That's alright, everyone is entitled to their opinions.

to be fair if you see those conspiarcy things about 9/11 is def makes you think twice

well yeah but im sure you could reasonably put forward a case for most things if your willing to spend months coming up with baseless specualtion.

you better start speculating about not being a fat cunt then...give it a few months.....

samiola wrote:

Harvey Prices Secret Twin wrote:

samiola wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The Magic Man wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The fact is, there is no-way we can tell if conspiracy theories are true. What's to say someone does come out and tell the "truth" of what happened.

The "people" behind it would have enough power to ruin and discredit them and then the actual "truth" would become a theory.

No. But what is more likely? That's basically what it comes down to.

Is it more likely thart several thousand people are covering up the attacks, or that terrorists did it?

& I am not going to got through all the other conspiracy aspects of the event, but all are extremely unlikely to happen individually. Put it all together and there is relatively no chance.

That's alright, everyone is entitled to their opinions.

to be fair if you see those conspiarcy things about 9/11 is def makes you think twice

well yeah but im sure you could reasonably put forward a case for most things if your willing to spend months coming up with baseless specualtion.

you better start speculating about not being a fat cunt then...give it a few months.....

I have a 4 inch waist.

Dubbed The New Wenger wrote:

Harvey Prices Secret Twin wrote:

samiola wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The Magic Man wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The fact is, there is no-way we can tell if conspiracy theories are true. What's to say someone does come out and tell the "truth" of what happened.

The "people" behind it would have enough power to ruin and discredit them and then the actual "truth" would become a theory.

No. But what is more likely? That's basically what it comes down to.

Is it more likely thart several thousand people are covering up the attacks, or that terrorists did it?

& I am not going to got through all the other conspiracy aspects of the event, but all are extremely unlikely to happen individually. Put it all together and there is relatively no chance.

That's alright, everyone is entitled to their opinions.

to be fair if you see those conspiarcy things about 9/11 is def makes you think twice

well yeah but im sure you could reasonably put forward a case for most things if your willing to spend months coming up with baseless specualtion.

The naysayers ain't exactly proving otherwise, are they? Equally reasonable.

Are they not? Go buy. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Mini-Bok wrote:

samiola wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The Magic Man wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The fact is, there is no-way we can tell if conspiracy theories are true. What's to say someone does come out and tell the "truth" of what happened.

The "people" behind it would have enough power to ruin and discredit them and then the actual "truth" would become a theory.

No. But what is more likely? That's basically what it comes down to.

Is it more likely thart several thousand people are covering up the attacks, or that terrorists did it?

& I am not going to got through all the other conspiracy aspects of the event, but all are extremely unlikely to happen individually. Put it all together and there is relatively no chance.

That's alright, everyone is entitled to their opinions.

to be fair if you see those conspiarcy things about 9/11 is def makes you think twice

Absolutely. But don't forget these programs a solely derived to make you think it's a conspiracy. Unless you have an open mind, and for the most part apply common sense, most of them can be unwravelled fairly easily.

The only one which I still think is a conspiracy is JFK.

dunno mate...CIA and all thoise agencies are fucking dodgy

Mini-Bok wrote:

samiola wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The Magic Man wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The fact is, there is no-way we can tell if conspiracy theories are true. What's to say someone does come out and tell the "truth" of what happened.

The "people" behind it would have enough power to ruin and discredit them and then the actual "truth" would become a theory.

No. But what is more likely? That's basically what it comes down to.

Is it more likely thart several thousand people are covering up the attacks, or that terrorists did it?

& I am not going to got through all the other conspiracy aspects of the event, but all are extremely unlikely to happen individually. Put it all together and there is relatively no chance.

That's alright, everyone is entitled to their opinions.

to be fair if you see those conspiarcy things about 9/11 is def makes you think twice

Absolutely. But don't forget these programs a solely derived to make you think it's a conspiracy. Unless you have an open mind, and for the most part apply common sense, most of them can be unwravelled fairly easily.

The only one which I still think is a conspiracy is JFK.

That one has to be a dead cert.

Although my favourite was that Saddam was an alien and the whole point of the first gulf war was to go in a capture him.

Also i recently heard that Hillary Clinton is actually a lizard woman

On a serious not. My Google Chrome web browser is fucking about. Whenever I try to post on 606, it gives me error sign:

"This web page is not available.

The web page at [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] might be temporarily down or it may have moved permanently to a new web address.

More information on this error"

Looked for solutions on the net. None found thus far. Anybody got a clue? Aberdeen?

Aberdeengooner wrote:

Mini-Bok wrote:

samiola wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The Magic Man wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The fact is, there is no-way we can tell if conspiracy theories are true. What's to say someone does come out and tell the "truth" of what happened.

The "people" behind it would have enough power to ruin and discredit them and then the actual "truth" would become a theory.

No. But what is more likely? That's basically what it comes down to.

Is it more likely thart several thousand people are covering up the attacks, or that terrorists did it?

& I am not going to got through all the other conspiracy aspects of the event, but all are extremely unlikely to happen individually. Put it all together and there is relatively no chance.

That's alright, everyone is entitled to their opinions.

to be fair if you see those conspiarcy things about 9/11 is def makes you think twice

Absolutely. But don't forget these programs a solely derived to make you think it's a conspiracy. Unless you have an open mind, and for the most part apply common sense, most of them can be unwravelled fairly easily.

The only one which I still think is a conspiracy is JFK.

That one has to be a dead cert.

Although my favourite was that Saddam was an alien and the whole point of the first gulf war was to go in a capture him.

Also i recently heard that Hillary Clinton is actually a lizard woman

No, the best one was the Twin Towers actually being a giant hologram!

Mini-Bok wrote:

Absolutely. But don't forget these programs a solely derived to make you think it's a conspiracy. Unless you have an open mind, and for the most part apply common sense, most of them can be unwravelled fairly easily.

The only one which I still think is a conspiracy is JFK.

You remember the Eniskillen bombing by the IRA? i reckon that was a conspiracy.

The hatred the IRA were subjected to after that effectively killed them, leading to the good friday agreement. and there's no way someone that high up in the IRA could have misjudged public opinion that badly to go bombing innocent people.

Dubbed The New Wenger wrote:

On a serious not. My Google Chrome web browser is fucking about. Whenever I try to post on 606, it gives me error sign:

"This web page is not available.

The web page at [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] might be temporarily down or it may have moved permanently to a new web address.

More information on this error"

Looked for solutions on the net. None found thus far. Anybody got a clue? Aberdeen?

You tried opening and using an incognito page? might be a dodgy cookie associated with the site.

Dubbed The New Wenger wrote:

On a serious not. My Google Chrome web browser is fucking about. Whenever I try to post on 606, it gives me error sign:

"This web page is not available.

The web page at [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] might be temporarily down or it may have moved permanently to a new web address.

More information on this error"

Looked for solutions on the net. None found thus far. Anybody got a clue? Aberdeen?

No problem on mine.

Uninstall google chrome.

Mini-Bok wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

Mini-Bok wrote:

samiola wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The Magic Man wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The fact is, there is no-way we can tell if conspiracy theories are true. What's to say someone does come out and tell the "truth" of what happened.

The "people" behind it would have enough power to ruin and discredit them and then the actual "truth" would become a theory.

No. But what is more likely? That's basically what it comes down to.

Is it more likely thart several thousand people are covering up the attacks, or that terrorists did it?

& I am not going to got through all the other conspiracy aspects of the event, but all are extremely unlikely to happen individually. Put it all together and there is relatively no chance.

That's alright, everyone is entitled to their opinions.

to be fair if you see those conspiarcy things about 9/11 is def makes you think twice

Absolutely. But don't forget these programs a solely derived to make you think it's a conspiracy. Unless you have an open mind, and for the most part apply common sense, most of them can be unwravelled fairly easily.

The only one which I still think is a conspiracy is JFK.

That one has to be a dead cert.

Although my favourite was that Saddam was an alien and the whole point of the first gulf war was to go in a capture him.

Also i recently heard that Hillary Clinton is actually a lizard woman

No, the best one was the Twin Towers actually being a giant hologram!

I heard Kim Jon Il was a badger.