Wednesday Thread - 08/09/10

right lunch, and i am starving. May even treat myself to a Harvey sized lunch today to quell the hunger.

Mini-Bok wrote:

Dubbed The New Wenger wrote:

Harvey Prices Secret Twin wrote:

samiola wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The Magic Man wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The fact is, there is no-way we can tell if conspiracy theories are true. What's to say someone does come out and tell the "truth" of what happened.

The "people" behind it would have enough power to ruin and discredit them and then the actual "truth" would become a theory.

No. But what is more likely? That's basically what it comes down to.

Is it more likely thart several thousand people are covering up the attacks, or that terrorists did it?

& I am not going to got through all the other conspiracy aspects of the event, but all are extremely unlikely to happen individually. Put it all together and there is relatively no chance.

That's alright, everyone is entitled to their opinions.

to be fair if you see those conspiarcy things about 9/11 is def makes you think twice

well yeah but im sure you could reasonably put forward a case for most things if your willing to spend months coming up with baseless specualtion.

The naysayers ain't exactly proving otherwise, are they? Equally reasonable.

Are they not? Go buy. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Wow. The opinion of one cunt named Aaronovitch. Guess that renders my whole argument.

Aberdeengooner wrote:

right lunch, and i am starving. May even treat myself to a Harvey sized lunch today to quell the hunger.

you'll never get through it. Takes a giant lunch to sustaina stomach this big.

Aberdeengooner wrote:

right lunch, and i am starving. May even treat myself to a Harvey sized lunch today to quell the hunger.

99.9% of Humans could not eat a Harvey sized lunch.

Dubbed The New Wenger wrote:

Mini-Bok wrote:

Dubbed The New Wenger wrote:

Harvey Prices Secret Twin wrote:

samiola wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The Magic Man wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The fact is, there is no-way we can tell if conspiracy theories are true. What's to say someone does come out and tell the "truth" of what happened.

The "people" behind it would have enough power to ruin and discredit them and then the actual "truth" would become a theory.

No. But what is more likely? That's basically what it comes down to.

Is it more likely thart several thousand people are covering up the attacks, or that terrorists did it?

& I am not going to got through all the other conspiracy aspects of the event, but all are extremely unlikely to happen individually. Put it all together and there is relatively no chance.

That's alright, everyone is entitled to their opinions.

to be fair if you see those conspiarcy things about 9/11 is def makes you think twice

well yeah but im sure you could reasonably put forward a case for most things if your willing to spend months coming up with baseless specualtion.

The naysayers ain't exactly proving otherwise, are they? Equally reasonable.

Are they not? Go buy. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Wow. The opinion of one cunt named Aaronovitch. Guess that renders my whole argument.

You stupid prick. He obviously outsources and uses FACTS. Which for the most part, conspiracy theories aren't.

Dubbed The New Wenger wrote:

Mini-Bok wrote:

Dubbed The New Wenger wrote:

Harvey Prices Secret Twin wrote:

samiola wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The Magic Man wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The fact is, there is no-way we can tell if conspiracy theories are true. What's to say someone does come out and tell the "truth" of what happened.

The "people" behind it would have enough power to ruin and discredit them and then the actual "truth" would become a theory.

No. But what is more likely? That's basically what it comes down to.

Is it more likely thart several thousand people are covering up the attacks, or that terrorists did it?

& I am not going to got through all the other conspiracy aspects of the event, but all are extremely unlikely to happen individually. Put it all together and there is relatively no chance.

That's alright, everyone is entitled to their opinions.

to be fair if you see those conspiarcy things about 9/11 is def makes you think twice

well yeah but im sure you could reasonably put forward a case for most things if your willing to spend months coming up with baseless specualtion.

The naysayers ain't exactly proving otherwise, are they? Equally reasonable.

Are they not? Go buy. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Wow. The opinion of one cunt named Aaronovitch. Guess that renders my whole argument.

Just for the record. When you say 'that renders my whole argument' that isnt a full sentence. You need to say 'that renders my whole argument obselete' or something to that effect.

The Magic Man wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

right lunch, and i am starving. May even treat myself to a Harvey sized lunch today to quell the hunger.

99.9% of Humans could not eat a Harvey sized lunch.

yep. i'm like the SAS of the canteen.

Mini-Bok wrote:

Dubbed The New Wenger wrote:

Mini-Bok wrote:

Dubbed The New Wenger wrote:

Harvey Prices Secret Twin wrote:

samiola wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The Magic Man wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The fact is, there is no-way we can tell if conspiracy theories are true. What's to say someone does come out and tell the "truth" of what happened.

The "people" behind it would have enough power to ruin and discredit them and then the actual "truth" would become a theory.

No. But what is more likely? That's basically what it comes down to.

Is it more likely thart several thousand people are covering up the attacks, or that terrorists did it?

& I am not going to got through all the other conspiracy aspects of the event, but all are extremely unlikely to happen individually. Put it all together and there is relatively no chance.

That's alright, everyone is entitled to their opinions.

to be fair if you see those conspiarcy things about 9/11 is def makes you think twice

well yeah but im sure you could reasonably put forward a case for most things if your willing to spend months coming up with baseless specualtion.

The naysayers ain't exactly proving otherwise, are they? Equally reasonable.

Are they not? Go buy. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Wow. The opinion of one cunt named Aaronovitch. Guess that renders my whole argument.

You stupid prick. He obviously outsources and uses FACTS. Which for the most part, conspiracy theories aren't.

There are zero facts in a conspiracy theory. It is all, what if's etc.

Harvey Prices Secret Twin wrote:

Dubbed The New Wenger wrote:

Mini-Bok wrote:

Dubbed The New Wenger wrote:

Harvey Prices Secret Twin wrote:

samiola wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The Magic Man wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The fact is, there is no-way we can tell if conspiracy theories are true. What's to say someone does come out and tell the "truth" of what happened.

The "people" behind it would have enough power to ruin and discredit them and then the actual "truth" would become a theory.

No. But what is more likely? That's basically what it comes down to.

Is it more likely thart several thousand people are covering up the attacks, or that terrorists did it?

& I am not going to got through all the other conspiracy aspects of the event, but all are extremely unlikely to happen individually. Put it all together and there is relatively no chance.

That's alright, everyone is entitled to their opinions.

to be fair if you see those conspiarcy things about 9/11 is def makes you think twice

well yeah but im sure you could reasonably put forward a case for most things if your willing to spend months coming up with baseless specualtion.

The naysayers ain't exactly proving otherwise, are they? Equally reasonable.

Are they not? Go buy. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Wow. The opinion of one cunt named Aaronovitch. Guess that renders my whole argument.

Just for the record. When you say 'that renders my whole argument' that isnt a full sentence. You need to say 'that renders my whole argument obselete' or something to that effect.

I am aware of that. Couldn't be bothered tbh.

The Magic Man wrote:

Mini-Bok wrote:

Dubbed The New Wenger wrote:

Mini-Bok wrote:

Dubbed The New Wenger wrote:

Harvey Prices Secret Twin wrote:

samiola wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The Magic Man wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The fact is, there is no-way we can tell if conspiracy theories are true. What's to say someone does come out and tell the "truth" of what happened.

The "people" behind it would have enough power to ruin and discredit them and then the actual "truth" would become a theory.

No. But what is more likely? That's basically what it comes down to.

Is it more likely thart several thousand people are covering up the attacks, or that terrorists did it?

& I am not going to got through all the other conspiracy aspects of the event, but all are extremely unlikely to happen individually. Put it all together and there is relatively no chance.

That's alright, everyone is entitled to their opinions.

to be fair if you see those conspiarcy things about 9/11 is def makes you think twice

well yeah but im sure you could reasonably put forward a case for most things if your willing to spend months coming up with baseless specualtion.

The naysayers ain't exactly proving otherwise, are they? Equally reasonable.

Are they not? Go buy. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Wow. The opinion of one cunt named Aaronovitch. Guess that renders my whole argument.

You stupid prick. He obviously outsources and uses FACTS. Which for the most part, conspiracy theories aren't.

There are zero facts in a conspiracy theory. It is all, what if's etc.

Well no, not strictly true. There are elements of conspiracy theories that are fact, like no fighter jets in the sky on 9/11 etc. But for the most part, it is if, buts and why's.

Mini-Bok wrote:

Dubbed The New Wenger wrote:

Mini-Bok wrote:

Dubbed The New Wenger wrote:

Harvey Prices Secret Twin wrote:

samiola wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The Magic Man wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The fact is, there is no-way we can tell if conspiracy theories are true. What's to say someone does come out and tell the "truth" of what happened.

The "people" behind it would have enough power to ruin and discredit them and then the actual "truth" would become a theory.

No. But what is more likely? That's basically what it comes down to.

Is it more likely thart several thousand people are covering up the attacks, or that terrorists did it?

& I am not going to got through all the other conspiracy aspects of the event, but all are extremely unlikely to happen individually. Put it all together and there is relatively no chance.

That's alright, everyone is entitled to their opinions.

to be fair if you see those conspiarcy things about 9/11 is def makes you think twice

well yeah but im sure you could reasonably put forward a case for most things if your willing to spend months coming up with baseless specualtion.

The naysayers ain't exactly proving otherwise, are they? Equally reasonable.

Are they not? Go buy. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Wow. The opinion of one cunt named Aaronovitch. Guess that renders my whole argument.

You stupid prick. He obviously outsources and uses FACTS. Which for the most part, conspiracy theories aren't.

Doubt it. He probably states something and adds "Superfact" at the end of it.

Mini-Bok wrote:

The Magic Man wrote:

Mini-Bok wrote:

Dubbed The New Wenger wrote:

Mini-Bok wrote:

Dubbed The New Wenger wrote:

Harvey Prices Secret Twin wrote:

samiola wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The Magic Man wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The fact is, there is no-way we can tell if conspiracy theories are true. What's to say someone does come out and tell the "truth" of what happened.

The "people" behind it would have enough power to ruin and discredit them and then the actual "truth" would become a theory.

No. But what is more likely? That's basically what it comes down to.

Is it more likely thart several thousand people are covering up the attacks, or that terrorists did it?

& I am not going to got through all the other conspiracy aspects of the event, but all are extremely unlikely to happen individually. Put it all together and there is relatively no chance.

That's alright, everyone is entitled to their opinions.

to be fair if you see those conspiarcy things about 9/11 is def makes you think twice

well yeah but im sure you could reasonably put forward a case for most things if your willing to spend months coming up with baseless specualtion.

The naysayers ain't exactly proving otherwise, are they? Equally reasonable.

Are they not? Go buy. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Wow. The opinion of one cunt named Aaronovitch. Guess that renders my whole argument.

You stupid prick. He obviously outsources and uses FACTS. Which for the most part, conspiracy theories aren't.

There are zero facts in a conspiracy theory. It is all, what if's etc.

Well no, not strictly true. There are elements of conspiracy theories that are fact, like no fighter jets in the sky on 9/11 etc. But for the most part, it is if, buts and why's.

Ive always wondered about the whole plane crashing into the pentagon thingy especially when you saw no debris of any plane in the wreckage of the pentagon

Mini-Bok wrote:

The Magic Man wrote:

Mini-Bok wrote:

Dubbed The New Wenger wrote:

Mini-Bok wrote:

Dubbed The New Wenger wrote:

Harvey Prices Secret Twin wrote:

samiola wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The Magic Man wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

The fact is, there is no-way we can tell if conspiracy theories are true. What's to say someone does come out and tell the "truth" of what happened.

The "people" behind it would have enough power to ruin and discredit them and then the actual "truth" would become a theory.

No. But what is more likely? That's basically what it comes down to.

Is it more likely thart several thousand people are covering up the attacks, or that terrorists did it?

& I am not going to got through all the other conspiracy aspects of the event, but all are extremely unlikely to happen individually. Put it all together and there is relatively no chance.

That's alright, everyone is entitled to their opinions.

to be fair if you see those conspiarcy things about 9/11 is def makes you think twice

well yeah but im sure you could reasonably put forward a case for most things if your willing to spend months coming up with baseless specualtion.

The naysayers ain't exactly proving otherwise, are they? Equally reasonable.

Are they not? Go buy. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Wow. The opinion of one cunt named Aaronovitch. Guess that renders my whole argument.

You stupid prick. He obviously outsources and uses FACTS. Which for the most part, conspiracy theories aren't.

There are zero facts in a conspiracy theory. It is all, what if's etc.

Well no, not strictly true. There are elements of conspiracy theories that are fact, like no fighter jets in the sky on 9/11 etc. But for the most part, it is if, buts and why's.

Not even sure that that is a fact. But you are correct, there may actually be some facts, but none that are relevant. Let's say there were no fighter jets in the air at the time. Why should there be? The conspiracy theorists will state that they should have been scrambled and could have intercepted the jets. This part is conjuncture and is where the facts are actually ignored.

The main issue I have with conspiracy theories, is that there's always something your average Joe picks up on. If these people, like the illuminati etc are behind such things, then why leave the most Mini-Bok thing questionable?

then why leave the most Mini-Bok thing questionable?
----------------------------------------------

Van Persies Left Foot wrote:

then why leave the most Mini-Bok thing questionable?
----------------------------------------------

Aberdeen you stupid cunt.

Harvey Prices Secret Twin wrote:

The Magic Man wrote:

Aberdeengooner wrote:

right lunch, and i am starving. May even treat myself to a Harvey sized lunch today to quell the hunger.

99.9% of Humans could not eat a Harvey sized lunch.

yep. i'm like the SAS of the canteen.

Or the claen living Muslim!!

Afternoon cunts

Fucking busy at work (no violins cunt)

Mini-Bok wrote:

The main issue I have with conspiracy theories, is that there's always something your average Joe picks up on. If these people, like the illuminati etc are behind such things, then why leave the most Mini-Bok thing questionable?

But check this out, stupid cunt. Isn't making things o.bvious the easiest way to deceive people?
Most people dismiss things that are out in the open.

Admin wrote:

Afternoon cunts

Fucking busy at work (no violins cunt)

you're always busy at work recently admin

absolute radio now if you wanna haer the new KOL tune

Van Persies Left Foot wrote:

Admin wrote:

Afternoon cunts

Fucking busy at work (no violins cunt)

you're always busy at work recently admin

I know and it's pissing me off

Admin wrote:

Van Persies Left Foot wrote:

Admin wrote:

Afternoon cunts

Fucking busy at work (no violins cunt)

you're always busy at work recently admin

I know and it's pissing me off

Can we use violins this time?

afternoon you cock sucking dog fucking ass licking short ass "smallness lacking" terrorist beardy cunts!

Mini-Bok wrote:

Van Persies Left Foot wrote:

then why leave the most Mini-Bok thing questionable?
----------------------------------------------

Aberdeen you stupid cunt.